The Antisocial Darwinist

Black sheep science from the Right side of campus. Plus music reviews.

  • About the Author
  • Contact Me
  • Music Reviews

Update on Alabama School Choice

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 12, 2022
Posted in: Homeschool, Politics. Leave a comment

Last week I mentioned a school choice bill being considered in Alabama that would help offset the costs of homeschool – or private or charter school for that matter – for parents in the state.  Apparently it’s not likely to pass, facing sufficient bipartisan opposition to not be able to escape a filibuster.  I’ll admit that I’m not 100% clear on the procedural rules in the Alabama legislature so apologies if I’m mischaracterizing things, but it looks indeed like the bill will probably evaporate.

To be clear, there is 0% chance Alabama will make it more difficult legally to homeschool ones’ kids.  This bill would just make it more affordable to homeschool – in other words, it’s relatively easy for a family like mine, living off a single fairly good income, to homeschool, but the financial burden of foregoing a second income, not to mention buying supplies, prices a lot of people out of the market entirely.  Thus, the bill under consideration would have little impact on me (maybe my summer vacation budget could go up a bit) but would open up homeschooling as a viable option for tens of thousands of Alabama families for whom it’s currently off the table.  Why would Alabama’s Democrat representatives – nearly all of whom represent districts dominated by lower-income black Alabamans who shoulder most of the burden from our poor education system – oppose a bill that would increase school choice for their constituents?  Probably because they are systemically opposed to doing anything to improve anyone’s lives.  But some Republicans have to oppose it as well, or else it wouldn’t have become filibuster-able.  What’s their deal?

It’s interesting to read the reasons people oppose the empowerment of school choice for lower income Americans, detailed in this article from 1819news.com.  Unsurprisingly, most of the complainers are upset that money will be diverted away from various inefficient public school programs that they profit from. From an insightful Cato Institute essay by Corey Deangelis:

The unions’ main argument to protect their monopoly is that school choice “defunds” public schools. But the money doesn’t belong to the public schools in the first place. Education funding is meant for educating children, not for propping up and protecting a particular institution.

Of course, if these grifters (cough cough teacher’s unions cough cough) were of any use, the public schools wouldn’t be so godsawful that people are willing to forego their careers to be homeschool teachers in order to save their children from them.

Many of the bill’s opponents seem bizarrely clueless about why people want to homeschool. Here’s Eric Mackey, the State Superintendent of Education:

We have no accountability for homeschoolers in this state. In other states, they require homeschoolers to register with the state. They have home visits, and they are required to take the state tests… If you are going to give them money, then they should take the same assessments as public schools.

So what Mackey wants is to inflict the same ineffective “assessments” on homeschools that have failed so spectacularly to improve the public schools.  Because standardized tests focus on very specific topic areas, they act as a de facto mandate for curricula – exactly the reason many of us have abandoned the public school system to begin with. Does he not realize this? Maybe he should, you know, listen to people before opening his bureaucratic yap? Disturbingly, it even seems there’s a chance this could get pushed into the bill as a poison pill amendment — at which point I would oppose it, as it would cause net harm to homeschoolers.

Here’s one of the aforementioned grifters, the boss of something called the “Council for Leaders in Alabama Schools”, putting it a different way:

If private schools are going to get public money, they should have to meet the exact same requirements as public schools…What if they don’t want to use the textbooks or the curriculum of the state?

Well exactly, bubba, you hit the nail on the head.  Your textbooks are garbage, hit the road, get a real job.

To be clear – assessments, curriculum mandates, and the constant Big Ed grifts are bugs, not features.  Everything about the public school system in the United States is awful.  One of the grifters laments that “Fifty-five to 60% of teachers are talking about leaving the education profession in the next two years” – and this is a reason we should not fund this bill?  Why do you think they’re leaving, genius?  Could it be that working in public schools is unremittingly toxic?  That if you actually care about education, being told by some ignorant bean-counter in Montgomery what you’re supposed to teach in your class is deeply offensive?  Or that realizing you’re just babysitting kids half the time, watching them waste their youths spending twice as long in school for half the intellectual gain they could achieve on their own, breaks your heart? Not to mention the efforts of the communist teachers’ unions… Yeah, it’s garbage, burn it down.

ASD’s school policy has been pretty consistent since 1986, y’all.  In as few words as possible:

Thoughts on the “digi-yuan”

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 10, 2022
Posted in: Economics, Politics. 1 Comment

Fred Reed posted an interesting – and disturbing, as is his style – article about the new digital yuan currency the Chinese government is debuting at the Winter Olympics (links from the original):

 The dijjywan, being rolled out in the Winter Olympics, is not a cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, intended to maintain anonymity of users: all transactions are or can be known to Beijing. A dijjywan account is not a bank account, though it is administered by PBOC, the People’s Bank of China … It is as close to being physical currency as you can get without being physical currency. Transactions are instantaneous and final.

So how does it work? As an individual, you will download an app that China calls a digital wallet to your cellphone, as you would any app. This is currently being done in China. You do a face scan and the system gives you a unique QR code. You now have a dijjywan account.

I don’t want to act like I know much about this, and will just encourage you to read Fred’s article and do your own research.  My main thought, though, is that this is the first I’ve heard of this currency, which is odd considering that it represents a possible contender with the dollar, or even with Bitcoin, for the world’s reserve currency.  Libertarians (like I used to be) have long warned that the only thing propping up the US is the fact that everyone in the world uses dollars – if the rug gets pulled out from under us on that front, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down and we’ll be as broke as Zimbabwe in a year.

I’ve always been a fan of the idea of hard money underlying national finances.  Gold, of course, is the “gold standard” on that front, but there has a been a lot of recent speculation that blockchain currencies like Bitcoin could serve a similar purpose, since they can’t be arbitrarily inflated or deflated by any form of government policy.  Basically, hard constraints on government’s spending ability are the bedrock of liberty, going back at least to Parliament effectively taking the purse strings away from Edward I Longshanks after he blew all of England’s money on futile foreign wars (sound familiar?).  The “digi-yuan” appears to be the exact opposite of that.  Seems like a bad idea to let the communist Chinese require you to scan your face to buy groceries.  But, as the Chinese philosopher supposedly said, “may you live in interesting times”….

Anarcho-tyranny in the Lab

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 8, 2022
Posted in: Academia, Economics, Politics. Leave a comment

It might not be obvious at times, reading this blog, but I do in fact run a laboratory full of brilliant scientists working on things microbiological.  I mostly try to keep politics out of the workplace, but of course in the era of Wokeness it’s increasingly difficult, as to the wannabe totalitarians bit by bit overwhelming our institutions, there can be no aspect of life outside of politics and the reach of the state.

Sometimes political crap hits the lab – or hits it by proxy, by hitting me and thereby threatening the lab’s funding.  Sometimes I wonder if the commies who try to get me fired realize that they would be taking the jobs of a dozen or so young people, representing roughly every race and creed and gender on Earth, at the same time?  (I suspect they do, and don’t care, any more than Brandon cares how many kids he blows up when he tries to cap a terrorist as a PR stunt.)  But sometimes everyday lab life just reminds me of the broader rot taking over society.

There’s this great concept, originally coined by the late Sam Francis, called anarcho-tyranny.  Here’s a definition from a 1993 Chronicles column:

the combination of oppressive government power against the innocent and the law-abiding and, simultaneously, a grotesque paralysis of the ability or the will to use that power to carry out basic public duties such as protection or public safety.

The term has come into prominence in recent months, even showing up a few times on Tucker Carlson’s various programs, as it really does capture some of the worst aspects of our current existence.  A great example: the government uses every coercive tool it can muster to trick, cajole, force, or threaten law-abiding citizens into complying with COVID vaccination protocols, but completely ignores the health conditions of millions of illegal aliens pouring into the country across the Mexican Border.  Or, the government drops the hammer on Kyle Rittenhouse for using a firearm to protect himself, but can’t be bothered to notice that street crime with guns has absolutely exploded since the regime’s stormtroopers declared war against local police in Summer 2020.  Or how about how you have to stress about every nickel you made on Bitcoin while filing your taxes, but Jeff Bezos can launder fifty gajillion dollars through fake NGOs, or Hunter Biden can take bribes in the form of art sales, without the IRS ever lifting a finger?  I could go on.

I was just reminded of anarcho-tyranny this week because of a handful of little annoyances in the lab.  Granted, these are a microcosm of the horrors that I just described, but they do really grind my gears.  Two things in particular really stand out as affecting a mid-range lab boss like myself – immigration and safety regulation – both of which are reflections of larger problems faced by people in “the real world”.

First, immigration.  I cannot express how irritating it is to me that I have to fill out tons of paperwork, pay money (basically bribes) to the State Department, and then pray that somebody at State will get off their ass and file the proper forms so I can get visas for foreign trainees who want to work in my lab.  I just had to send $3500 from one government agency to another government agency to fast-track a visa for a brilliant Chinese scientist who is already in my lab to keep him from having to go back to China before finishing the project that I hired him to do and for which we still have funding.  In another debacle, because of onerous COVID travel restrictions I wasn’t able to get a Brazilian graduate student into the country for over a year, during which time we were basically treading water on his PhD work and putting our research on hold until the world stopped being insane.  This sort of thing has popped up over and over since I started as a PI; it eats a lot of time, a lot of money, and causes a lot of headaches and hardship for a lot of people.

But hey, look, while I’m eating paperwork to convince the government to let young geniuses temporarily come to the United States to study with me, literally millions of unvetted, unskilled people just walk across the border from Mexico.  MILLIONS of people.  Presumably those people will flood the unskilled labor markets, driving down wages and eliminating positions needed by poor or just-starting-out Americans.  And they won’t leave, either, so the problems they cause are permanent with essentially no solution that any decent person wants to think too deeply about.  So the government puts huge amounts of energy into hassling a few thousand 140-IQ science trainees who come for 3-5 years and then go home, but can’t be bothered to lift a finger to prevent millions of 80-IQ scabs from coming in and never leaving.  Training the worlds’ scientists is a great idea – not only do we get to benefit from their minds for the years they are here, but they will go home with pleasant memories of their time in the US, and we all end up having dear friends scattered all over the world, strengthening both science and diplomacy.  But letting in the world’s desperate masses?  There are billions of them, and they will never stop coming until this patch of dirt is just as miserable as the ones they are coming from.  Seems like a bad call to me, but in an anarcho-tyrannical state, it makes perfect sense to put all of the State’s immigration energy into the former, while ignoring the latter.

The other irritation comes from safety regulations.  It seems they never stop becoming stricter and more labyrinthine.  I developed this great microbiology lab course that was built around making artwork out of bacteria isolated from the dirt, but it got shut down by my university’s safety office because I couldn’t outright guarantee that nobody would isolate anthrax or some other deadly thing out of the soil.  Never mind that it’s literally the dirt outside the building, so if there’s anthrax there you’ve got more to worry about than my teaching lab… or that most of my students plan to become medical professionals at some point, where they will definitely be exposed to communicable pathogens a lot worse than anything you can get out if potting soil, and most of them will, amazingly, never take another course in microbiology.  But no, the infinitesimal risk is too much for the administrators.  On top of that, I even have to fill out lugubrious loads of paperwork to work with similar things in my lab – where only experts have access to them!  If I want to exchange strains of bacteria with other researchers, it all has to be documented in the same way if it’s a harmless lab rat E. coli strain as if it’s cholera.  It’s worth noting that I don’t have, like, a secretary or anything, so all of this paperwork gets filled out by me personally, making roughly $60 an hour (paid for by your tuition dollars, parents!) to do this drudge work that probably nobody actually looks at.

But while I’m being paid to fill out forms, and others are paid to check my forms and stamp my forms and file my forms, for the privilege of working with harmless pond scum, luminaries like Peter Daszak and Tony Fauci play around with communist virologists editing bat coronavirus genomes with apparently no oversight of any kind, ultimately accidentally (?) unleashing a flu pandemic on mankind that shuts the planet down for two years (and counting) and causes an epidemic of mass formation psychosis to descend across the land like a plague miasma on a medieval graveyard.  I’m sure they had their people fill out the proper forms in triplicate just like I do – I bet Tony has two secretaries! – but so what?  Obviously the forms didn’t do any good.  The regulations don’t prevent harm, they just burden people with compliance – the government puts its foot on the little guy’s neck while completely failing to accomplish the goal it supposedly is trying to achieve.  Anarcho-tyranny at its best.

A lot of people have this idea that government regulation protects common people against moneyed interests, but the exact opposite is actually true.  Regulations create ponderous burdens for normal people, but are trivially overcome by actors with the financial resources to hire people whose sole purpose is to get around regulations.  Regulations protect the powerful at the expense of the weak.  Anarcho-tyranny, in other words, is the key mechanism by which an oligarchy maintains its power; the law exists for them, as a tool to dominate you.

Music Drop 7 February 2022

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 7, 2022
Posted in: Music Reviews. Tagged: frigid and spellbound, hate über alles, kreator, spectral wound. Leave a comment

If you’re like me you catch up on reading blogs over coffee in the morning. Well, here’s a track that is 195% more effective at waking you up than caffeine. This is the title track from Kreator’s new record Hate über alles. These guys have somehow gotten faster since I first heard them circa 1986. Here’s to staving off the arthritis demons as long as possible — make sure to stick around for the shred-as-fvck solo toward the end:

Also, check out this earworm from Québécois black metal outfit Spectral Wound. I’m not sure if there’s a genre name for “black metal with catchy melodic riffs tremolo picked at 200bpm, sort of like Transilvanian Hunger but cooler” but if there is, that’s what this track is. I think I listened to it 5 times back to back when I first heard it. The opening riff makes me want to put my fist through a wall (in a good way).

Steve Sailer Meets Charles Murray

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 5, 2022
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

In case you haven’t seen it yet, there is a series of very cool podcasts at Ricochet (part 1, part 2)where Steve Sailer and Charles Murray — the arch thought criminals themselves! — hash out some interesting and topical ideas. I’ve been reading Sailer’s columns for decades, and consider him to be one of the most out-of-the-box thinkers I’ve ever read. Murray mentions it a couple of times in the first podcast, but Sailer somehow manages to connect outlandishly disparate ideas (e.g. golf course design, baseball statistics, and human genetics) in ways that lead to often unexpected new directions. He’s probably the most influential writer on the right that no one ever quotes by name — probably because there’s this brigade of skinny, acne-faced communists that Google his name and try to cancel anybody that acknowledges his existence (they’ve commented to this blog before, and can, as a merry little pink-haired group, go fuck themselves). And of course Murray’s book with Richard Herrnstein, The Bell Curve, is a classic of the genre of “calmly argued, imminently sensible books that have inspired violent mobs of fragile people to do incredibly stupid things“. It’s also up there with great books like Ulysses, Atlas Shrugged, and The Koran, that lots of people have very strong opinions about without ever having taken the time to read like, a single word of them.

Anyway, have a listen, it’s worth your time. The only thing that could have made it better would have been if they could have gotten Thomas Sowell in on the conversation as well.

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • “Make Biology Great Again, Mr President” March 7, 2025
    • How to Rig an Election If You’re a Scientist February 9, 2023
    • Found: Nazi Flag in the US Capitol December 21, 2022
    • For Giving Tuesday, Support a Cancelled Professor November 29, 2022
    • The 20th Anniversary of Palindrome November 20, 2022
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

The Antisocial Darwinist
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Join 58 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...