The Antisocial Darwinist

Black sheep science from the Right side of campus. Plus music reviews.

  • About the Author
  • Contact Me
  • Music Reviews

“Make Biology Great Again, Mr President”

Posted by Jeff Morris on March 7, 2025
Posted in: Academia, Politics. Tagged: health, news, politics, science, trump. Leave a comment

At long last, there is hope in the United States, and gods willing, hope for the redemption of science in our fair land. The resurrected Trump regency has purged the evil of “DEI” racism from the government, and it certainly looks like the very sensible Jay Bhattacharya will inherit the head position at the NIH, which is wonderful news after a decade of full spectrum dominance of federal science funding agencies by social justice warriors and regime apparatchiks.

So I’m hopeful… but also, those few of us right-wingers who have survived in academia to this late date are feeling the boot on our necks just as heavily as our erstwhile enemies these days:

  • All funding has been effectively throttled pending review for DEI-themed civil rights violations — a review that is happening at a snail’s pace because large chunks of the staff at NIH and NSF have been pre-emptively fired.
  • The administration has decreed a cap on “indirect” payments to universities of 15%, which will eviscerate the infrastructure at every R1 institution in the US. For those of you who don’t know, “indirects” are basically a tax that universities charge to academic researchers, where a percentage of your total funding is confiscated by the university to pay — well, nobody knows exactly what it pays for. Some combination of “keeping the lights on” and “paying the university race commissars to doxx you on bluesky” is probably accurate. But these payments, sometimes representing more than 50% of the total grant award, are the lifeblood of a research university, and without them — well, the university DEI vice-president what be able to buy xer new shark tank, and we can’t have that, can we?
  • And looming over all of that is a threat to massively tax university endowments — akin to Henry VIII confiscating all the gold from Catholic monasteries in England after his spat with the Pope, this would result in the near total annihilation of the major research university as it has existed in the United States for the past 80 years.

Tl;dr: there is a scorched earth campaign sweeping across the American university today, led by a wild-eyed mob of nationalists with an axe to grind. At this point it’s indiscriminate — and I understand why, because the leftist lawfare campaign that throttled the first Trump presidency would chew up a more moderate reform movement before it could get started. But it’s a shame, because American science was, at least until the Great Awokening around 2014, a historical marvel and one of the greatest achievements of the human species. It still can be, but only if we can survive the righteous fury of the present jihad.

I’ve said before on this blog that the only way we can get out of the corner our country has painted itself into — at least without bloodshed — is for one political faction to be ideologically defeated thoroughly enough that it actually believes it was wrong and asks for forgiveness. With Trump’s crushing defeat of the historically catastrophic Biden junta and the whirlwind blitzkrieg of his first month in office, I think it is safe to say that the race communist ideology of the Woke Democrats has been quite thoroughly defeated. Now, the losing side must submit and acknowledge the crimes it committed, or else it will face the same brutal and total victor’s justice that their ideological predecessors, also race-obsessed warmongers with a hatred of free speech, faced at Nuremberg. But alas, the defeated enemy remains so mired in xer own propaganda that xe doesn’t even understand what motivates the victors.

So I offer the following extremely well-written short essay to those of you who may be hate-reading this blog — or for those of you who are fellow scientists on the “right side of history” who want a good way to explain to your shell-shocked colleagues “why this is happening to you”. And I also offer it to my readers who, like me, remain deeply angry about what scientists did to the world — and to the US in particular — in the COVID years, as a plea for why academic science is worth saving. I hope you will all read it and share it widely — I did not write this (I originally saw it on Steve Sailer’s Substack but lifted the text from here) but I agree with every bit of it, and I hope everyone on both sides of the aisle who wants to see America return to its rightful spot as the greatest research power on Earth will read it and take it to heart:

An opinion piece by anonymous scientists.

Proposed Title: Make Biology Great Again, Mr. President

Five years ago, COVID, the deadliest pandemic since the Spanish flu, swept the globe. Optimists predicted that a remedy for COVID could soon be found in the United States. By the end of 2020, these observers were vindicated by Operation Warp Speed, a triumph of American science, medicine, and logistics. Although vaccines were also developed in other countries, it was the American vaccines that were most widely deployed, saving millions of lives here and abroad. Because President Trump has been denied any political benefit from Warp Speed, his oversight of it qualifies as the most virtuous act of his presidency so far.

Whether he advances his legacy will depend in part on how he reforms the National Institutes of Health (NIH). His aides and interim appointees have made serious errors overseeing NIH, apparently in a hamfisted effort to eliminate two real, grave threats to American excellence: waste and wokeness. Thousands of researchers at NIH have been fired, supposedly but implausibly for cause. The entire NIH system for supporting university research has been disrupted by sudden and drastic cuts in proposed funding. It is difficult not to suspect an element of vindictiveness in these indiscriminate mass layoffs and cutbacks.

The biomedical community, however, must recognize where this vengeful mood comes from. It is righteous anger directed at NIH and life scientists more generally. Although scientists should be thanked and honored for developing effective COVID therapeutics, it is quite possible that other scientists created COVID in the first place and then concealed their culpability from President Trump and the nation. The negligent release of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus killed millions of people, cost trillions of dollars, laid kindling for the political firestorms of 2020, and perhaps changed the result of its U.S. presidential election. If one denies the possibility that COVID arose from scientific irresponsibility, one then has to explain the behavior of health authorities of both China and America that seems to betray consciousness of guilt. Subsequent responses to COVID by American biomedical authorities were also objectionable: requiring masking despite its questionable efficacy, closing schools despite the harm done to children, and barring people from their churches and outdoor recreations while encouraging mass left-wing protests.

However understandable disenchantment with NIH may be, such blind lashing out at the researchers working there or supported by it must be condemned. The vast majority of the rank and file had no part in the malfeasance outlined above. The history of German physics and Russian biology in the first half of the 20th century shows that scientific excellence is hard to build, but terribly easy to destroy. Even if U.S. researchers depart for other countries, as their German and Russian predecessors did, there is no guarantee that they will rebuild the excellence that has won America more than 100 Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine. More Chinese Americans have won scientific Nobel Prizes than PRC citizens, though the former are a mere 1/200th of the latter. Of 28 highly transformative medicines approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1985 and 2002, 80% arose from basic biological research conducted decades before FDA approval. Extinguishing biomedical science in America may plunge the whole world into mediocrity, and deprive it of a precious resource that has repeatedly saved and extended lives everywhere.

We propose to treat NIH’s misbehavior in the way that a prudent commander treats a mutiny. Examples should be made of the worst offenders. The origin of COVID must be rigorously investigated, and if any American scientists are found to have engaged in misconduct, a select few should be dismissed or even delivered to the Department of Justice. Social-justice commissars must be sent packing. All other NIH employees should be reinstated and allowed to resume their legitimate scientific activities. We also propose that revisions of NIH’s support to universities should be done in a measured way that allows reform and improvement rather than capricious destruction. As part of this rapprochement, scientists must recognize that Republicans have built a broad coalition of Americans from all races who want the country’s biomedical institutions cleansed of irresponsible scientific behavior and committed to politically impartial scientific judgment. If biomedical scientists embrace these goals, they will win back the trust whose absence is now derailing their work and causing laypeople to spurn professional medical guidance.

During the Civil War, America began the land-grant system that made college education possible for the children of farmers and factory workers. During the Great Depression, America founded NIH, which led to ninety years of biological innovation. In 2025, America again faces crisis. But we are a country that builds for the future even when others might despair. Let us renew NIH so that it continues its work for the benefit of America, and of all nations.

How to Rig an Election If You’re a Scientist

Posted by Jeff Morris on February 9, 2023
Posted in: Academia, Politics, Vaccination. Leave a comment

A very interesting analysis came out today of Pfizer’s decision to forego announcing the success of their COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials until a few days after the 2020 US presidential election was over. In case you have forgotten, in 2020 President Donald Trump initiated a Manhattan Project scale effort — “Project Warp Speed” — to develop and release a vaccine against the virus that was infecting everyone’s brains amygdalas respiratory tracts. I didn’t believe the effort would succeed, since the fastest I was aware of any vaccine ever being approved for release was about five years; in retrospect I still don’t think the trials succeeded, although this wasn’t really Pfizer’s fault, as if the vaccines had been deployed sensibly instead of being forced universally on the world’s population they might still work today, and that was a government decision, not a corporate one. But the question of whether or not the vaxx was “safe and effective” is not the subject of this post — the question is, why did Pfizer wait to reveal the results of their trial until it had no chance of helping Donald Trump’s electoral desirability? To quote the article:

In the alternate universe where the 32-case interim analysis was conducted as set forth in the original study protocol, The New York Times would have run a full page headline declaring the success of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine right around the morning of November 2nd, the day before the election… On a political level, you’ll have to confer with Nate Silver on whether the Pfizer news would have been enough to swing 100,000 votes in Pennsylvania, 30,000 votes in Wisconsin, and 20,000 votes in Georgia and put Donald Trump back in the White House… What’s truly crazy is that a few pharma executives, unaccountable to both the public and their shareholders, got to make this crucial decision, and that they got away with it without a hint of a congressional subpoena.

“How Pfizer Fixed the Election” by Cassian Anderson (a pseudonym for a molecular biologist who is obviously much wiser than me in terms of operational security)

Like so many other things about the 2020 election, this smacks of conspiracy, committed by the deracinated, unelected, and mostly incompetent oligarchical elites of the United States to hamstring the grassroots nationalist insurgency represented by the Trump regime and that threatened their status. If one believes that the vaxx is “safe and effective” then it must be acknowledged that the choice made by Pfizer delayed the full-scale deployment of the vaccine for a couple of weeks, and in the winter of 2020-2021 that represented literally tens of thousands of human lives lost. But regardless of its ultimate efficacy, millions of Americans were eagerly awaiting some good news about their lives returning to normal, and their opinion of Trump’s handling of the “pandemic” — which was deeply underwater just before the election — likely would have changed dramatically. Executives at Pfizer, in all likelihood in collusion with government officials at NIH such as Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci, made a conscious decision to manipulate the election by withholding the results of mission critical federally-funded research from the public. At a minimum this is the grossest kind of violation of professional ethics for a scientist; but I believe it is also a clear-cut violation of several federal laws such as the Hatch Act that prevent the involvement of agencies like NIH with the political process in the US. A serious country would investigate it; but of course our investigatory agencies like the FBI are clearly “in on it”, judging by the revelation of their election-rigging activities at Twitter.

In a post I released immediately before the 2022 midterm elections, I argued that the only way the US returns to normal is either through something akin to a civil war, or a collective mea culpa or other type of debt-paying by the elites that have brought us to this dire juncture in our history. One form that mea culpa could take is something like a Nuremberg trial for the people responsible for the “pandemic” and all of its metastatic outgrowths, including the rigging of the 2020 US Presidential election. It’s possible that the current crop of congress-critters might at least bring them to question, but I highly doubt anything of consequence will happen to them — or at least not many of them; they may throw someone to the wolves but it will just be for theatrical purposes. The oligarchy protects its own.

Found: Nazi Flag in the US Capitol

Posted by Jeff Morris on December 21, 2022
Posted in: Politics, War. Leave a comment

Without a doubt, the most disgusting photograph I’ve ever seen:

The idea of that vile Nazi rag and that filthy degenerate tyrant being honored by the so-called government of my country is beyond nauseating. And as propaganda, it has a decidedly contrary impact on me from what I suspect it’s intended to have. Where I was formerly vaguely distressed at the suffering of the average Ukrainian, now I’m eager to see the country devastated and conquered, as long as the end result is this verminous weasel’s head ending up on a pike somewhere.

And wow, man, remember when they said that the Q-Anon Shaman was “disgracing” the capitol chambers? What absolute sociopathic scumbags. Hell, I’d vote to enter the war on Russia’s side at this point. Wouldn’t that be a hoot?

For Giving Tuesday, Support a Cancelled Professor

Posted by Jeff Morris on November 29, 2022
Posted in: Academia, Politics. Leave a comment

I think it’s weird how the United States embarks on an annual glut of consumerism on the day after Thanksgiving, a holiday that celebrates a group of people living under the most primitive possible conditions, existing on the bleeding edge of Malthusian survival while trying to establish an unlikely colony thousands of miles away from anybody else from their native country. It’s even weirder how that “Black Friday” spending spree has spawned at least two other finance-related holidays — “Cyber Monday”, where one basically pays one’s Amazon.com tax for the year, and “Giving Tuesday”, where, if you have any money left, you should consider donating some of it to a worthy charity.

But whatever, that’s the world we’re in, so if you are of the mind to contribute some of your hard-earned money today — or perhaps your not-so-hard-earned-money if you are a Bitcoin millionaire — I would like to direct your attention to the GiveSendGo of Dr. Bryan Pesta. Dr. Pesta is a veteran lecturer and professor of management at Cleveland State University who was unceremoniously fired from his tenured faculty position for having the temerity to co-author a 2019 paper with rogue geneticist Emil Kirkegaard that dealt with intelligence differences between human groups. Briefly, the paper tests the hypothesis that genetics underlie at least some of the variation in g-factor intelligence between human groups (i.e., races, in the classical sense of the word) by looking at how genetic admixture between groups influences g. Most previous work on the topic (e.g., The Bell Curve) compared people according to a single, self-identified racial group, but in this work respondents were allowed to select multiple racial groups. Basically, one would expect that admixed individuals would have intermediate phenotypes compared to the “pure” groups from which they derived, which is exactly what they reported:

They also applied this to gene variants from a GWAS study, and concluded that about 25% of the variation in g could be explained by gene variants that had already been associated with educational attainment. The authors also incorporated metrics in their regression analyses corresponding to responses commonly given against the validity of this sort of analysis — the sort of good-faith analysis that anyone should do, particularly when conducting controversial research — and found that socioeconomic status had a small (compared to genetic background) but significant impact on g, but visible phenotypes like skin and eye color were not significant. In their abstract, the authors make the fairly milquetoast and obvious conclusion:

Results converge on genetics as a potential partial explanation for group mean differences in intelligence.

Psych 2019, 1(1), 431-459; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych1010034

For this, Dr. Pesta was fired. From his tenured job! I’m no expert on human genetics so I’m not going to go out into the weeds regarding the technical details of this paper, but it seems to pass the smell test to me — it may turn out to be wrong given future research, but the work appears to have been done in good faith and does not appear to me to have some kind of political goal, other than trying to bring some sort of empirical sanity to our culture’s never-ending obsession with race. But because the paper came to a politically unacceptable conclusion — no matter whether it was true or not — the authors had to be sacked.

It goes without saying that this sort of response is utterly antithetical to the mission of a university. If our institutions don’t exist to seek and provide truth to the best of our capacity, then what good are they? You don’t need a university to spout propaganda — if that’s all you want, why waste the money on the research? Just say what you want and be done with it. If you do want to know the answers to life’s persistent questions, however, you have to be open to the possibility that the answers will not conform exactly to your preconceived notions.

If good-faith research is punished by excommunication from academia, then the whole edifice of modern science is fucked. If you agree with that statement, PLEASE help Dr. Pesta fight for his job by donating to his GiveSendGo:

https://www.givesendgo.com/G9END

The 20th Anniversary of Palindrome

Posted by Jeff Morris on November 20, 2022
Posted in: Music Reviews. Leave a comment

I don’t normally hawk my own artistic output on this blog, but I’m going to make an exception over the next couple of weeks. You see, it’s been exactly 20 years today since my partner in crime Wiley Wells (check out his amazing new album here) and I released our album Palindrome, which remains one of the accomplishments I am most proud of. Sure, relatively few people ever actually listened to it — although it did generate a bit of interest at the time, Wiley and I split shortly after the release for the typical reasons that bands break up, and without us playing regular shows the record just sort of evaporated after a while. But despite that, the album accomplished what I intended of it, which was basically to get out of my system some kind of artistic mind virus that had been obsessing me for years. Whatever its merits from a musical perspective, the album was a spiritual victory for me, and I like to think you can hear the passion we put into it when you listen to the songs even after so many years.

The album was, I suppose, a sort of concept album, as cringe as that can sometimes be. The theme was one of cyclical death and rebirth, symbolized through the turning of seasons and also through the idea of palindromes, which are character strings that are the same forward as backward (e.g., tacocat). We released the album on 20-11-02, a palindromic date. We were essentially invoking a Spenglerian vision of civilizational cycles, embodied in an extended metaphor of the birth, violent life, spiritual collapse, and obscure, lonely death of an unnamed person. I guess none of this was really explicit in any of the tracks, but you can sort of tease it out of the lyrics if you know what we were thinking about when we wrote the thing.

Anyway, for the sake of posterity I will write more about some of my favorite individual tracks from this record over the coming weeks. Today, we have put together a 20th anniversary downloadable edition on Bandcamp that has three older bonus tracks, including what I think might be the best song I ever wrote. Maybe you listen? Maybe you share? I can promise you that any money we get from downloads will go to subversive causes furthering our slide into, and beyond, the Global American Empire’s Spenglerian winter.

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
  • Recent Posts

    • “Make Biology Great Again, Mr President” March 7, 2025
    • How to Rig an Election If You’re a Scientist February 9, 2023
    • Found: Nazi Flag in the US Capitol December 21, 2022
    • For Giving Tuesday, Support a Cancelled Professor November 29, 2022
    • The 20th Anniversary of Palindrome November 20, 2022
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

The Antisocial Darwinist
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Join 58 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...