The Antisocial Darwinist

Black sheep science from the Right side of campus. Plus music reviews.

  • About the Author
  • Contact Me
  • Music Reviews

Everything Old is New Again

Posted by Jeff Morris on December 9, 2021
Posted in: Politics. Leave a comment

A couple of days ago I found myself lamenting, on the 80th anniversary of Pearl Harbor, that the United States was no longer capable of doing much of anything, much less rising to meet a challenge like that posed by the Japanese Empire in 1941. We’re lucky if we can keep the lights on from day to day. But that line of thinking kind of set me off in an unexpected and disturbing direction, considering the accumulating parallels between our Current Year and the dark times of the 1930s and 1940s. Consider:

  1. A great world war — the Cold War — ended about thirty years ago, leaving the world order broken and unstable. The United States seemed to be the sole dominant power remaining on Earth, but bit by bit it lost its hold on things. A big part of that involved a major worldwide economic downturn and “defeat” in a series of pointless foreign colonial wars. Today, there is no single world order, but rather about four Great Powers — the US/UK, the EU, Russia, and China — with mutually exclusive interests and mutually distrustful of each other. All of which are expanding their military capabilities, EXCEPT for the former sole superpower, the US, which is aggressively weakening its military, becoming increasingly vulnerable.
  2. Two of the great powers, the US and EU, have come under the control of a fanatical political movement that is enormously popular with young people. It is completely untethered from reality, with amazingly exotic beliefs about the fundamental nature of reality, and revolves around the need to radically rework society to further a revolutionary moral code that is both unprecedented and impossible. Importantly, this movement is united behind an irrational racial hatred wherein a single ethnic group is implausibly blamed for all of history’s crimes and all current social problems. Members of this ethnic group are simultaneously portrayed as bumbling morons and diabolical masterminds, but always in the service of maximizing the hatred directed toward them in media propaganda. The movement has solidified its power by capturing most of the media organs, government bureaucracies, and the commanding heights of industry and finance in the US and EU, all of which were captured by a generation-long process of infiltration and subversion — through the erecting of “fifth columns” in all of these institutions.
  3. This fanatical political movement faces serious resistance in the US, however, but has moved to eradicate that resistance by leveraging a fake “insurrection” (i.e. the January 6 Reichstag fire) to justify an unprecedented removal of civil rights protections from the political opponents of the current regime. This oppression descends directly from the regime’s secret state police (how do you say that in German?) and collaborating federal and local courts. This attempt to crush domestic resistance corresponds with an increasingly belligerent attitude toward foreign countries — and in particular one great power, Russia — that haven’t bent the knee to the regime.
  4. Disturbingly, human rights violations are beginning to accumulate. The US regime is running a Guantanamo-style political dungeon in Washington DC for the dissidents captured after 1/6. Germany, amazingly, has resurrected Nazi-era slogans for persecuting “unvaccinated” citizens — “Ungeimpfte nicht erwünscht!” — and followers of the fanatical political movement routinely endorse interring or even killing people who don’t take the useless shots, with no concern for consequences for such speech because there will be none. This blog has documented numerous examples of online mob attacks on political dissidents, and of course the fanatics have directly endorsed hundreds of attacks on government and economic targets in cities across the US and EU supposedly in the name of “social justice” but in fact simply giving vent to their racist conspiracy theories and desire to smash and replace the government and social structure of their own country. The tacit government endorsement of this irrational race hate and desire to persecute political opponents is directly reminiscent of the tactics used by the NSDAP to cement control over Weimar Germany. Yeah, I know, it’s cringe to compare shit to the Nazis, but it is warranted now. Consider the testimony of a survivor of the NSDAP period, and try to convince yourself it isn’t happening right now:
  1. And perhaps the most concerning parallel is the appearance that the great powers are beginning to line themselves up into two sets of allied groups. Consider the nightmare unfolding on the Ukrainian border, where the everlasting hard-on the Democrats have for Russia and Putin appears to be hurtling toward World War III. The affection the US elite has for Ukraine has eluded me for a long time — I wrote about the situation early on in my time writing this blog, wondering why we felt the need to take sides in a war between ethnonationalist western Ukrainians and ethnically Russian eastern Ukrainians. The revelation of corrupt pay-offs between Ukrainian oil oligarchs and the Biden family seems to answer that question… but nevertheless it doesn’t change the fact that Biden and his business pals are engaging in nuclear brinksmanship with Russia for the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Given that the other side of the US political spectrum explicitly advocates normalizing relations with Russia (hell, that’s the #1 reason I voted for Trump), and given that Biden is moving from failure to failure and the Democrats look to be completely wiped out in 2022 and 2024 unless something radically changes, with likely nationalist gains in the UK and France as well, it’s entirely possible that in a year or two the US and Russia could be shaking hands, leaving battle lines drawn similarly to those that predated WWII, only with China taking the place of Japan. And even the pro-war messaging would be similar — a conflict between a “Greater East Asian Coprosperity Sphere” and a Germany-centered EU on one side, and Russia and the Anglosphere on the other, in a fight to preserve civilization against an inhuman and fanatical tyranny with tentacles extending into every nation on Earth.

As always, I hope I’m wrong. But I’m usually not. Let’s just say I’m #Rootin4Putin to back Brandon down the way Kennedy backed down Krushchev — maybe if we can forestall war, there’s still a chance to save Western Civilization from these bastards.

The US Needs an Eric Zemmour

Posted by Jeff Morris on December 5, 2021
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: civic nationalism. Leave a comment

I had never heard of this guy a month ago but he seems to be everywhere now, and he might actually have a shot at the French Presidency. Take the time to watch his announcement of his candidacy — one could not hope for a clearer statement of civic nationalist ideals:

Yeah, the pusillanimous hacks at YouTube dropped an age restriction on it to limit its visibility. Click through and watch it, it’s worth it.

Grotesque Malpractice

Posted by Jeff Morris on December 2, 2021
Posted in: Academia, Evolution, Vaccination. Tagged: coronavirus, Vaccination, vaccine mandate. Leave a comment

Dear reader, if you have been checking this blog periodically expecting a rant about the coronavirus vaccine, I apologize for keeping you waiting. Even after my university eagerly declared it was ready to fire several thousand employees, ranging from tenured professors to custodians, if they haven’t been vaxxed by January 4, I stayed quiet. If you’ve been with me for a while you know I am on the record since 2015 as opposing vaccine mandates, and last summer I weighed in on the side of a herd immunity strategy for dealing with the so-called coronavirus “pandemic”, since I expected that an effective vaccine would not be forthcoming in a reasonable period of time (turns out I was right, see below). Since then I have been religiously following the published research on the SARS-2 outbreak, and some colleagues and I have also entertained ourselves by keeping up with some of the publicly available datasets on case numbers, deaths, vaccinations, and so forth, as a reality check on the egregiously dumbed-down messaging coming from “public health authorities”, whatever those are. I’ve been very active in a few semi-public online forums discussing some of these issues, and have even gone so far as to lobby my state legislators for certain SARS-2 related policies I wanted to see enacted. But, uncharacteristically, I haven’t written about any of this on this blog. Why?

Two reasons, really. First, I remained cautiously optimistic until late summer that the vaccines would ultimately work, and that we would rapidly achieve herd immunity through vaccination and/or natural recovery and put this craziness behind us. Second, I am ashamed to say that I was (and still am, to be honest) afraid of the vaccine’s supporters. If Woke needed an excuse to go full Nazi, I guess this was it. Given that these people are erecting gulags and concentration camps in multiple countries, I felt motivated not to get on their hit list, and held out hope that the world would return to sanity before things got much worse.

OK, that was then, this is now. I feel like if I don’t make at least a token effort to demonstrate that not everyone at my university is a lying piece of shit, I will be doing a great disservice both to my students/trainees and to microbiologists both past and future. So here’s my pronouncement, in extra large font to make sure you don’t miss it:

THE VACCINES DON’T WORK.

That has to be the beginning of any discussion of vaccine mandates, travel restrictions, or whatever – the vaccines in their current form never worked properly, don’t work at all any more, and what’s more, it should have been obvious to everyone involved in their creation that they wouldn’t work . There’s no point in getting bogged down on the ethical and moral dimensions of mandating vaccination when the vaccine in question doesn’t actually work to begin with!

I first became concerned about the effectiveness of the SARS-2 vaccines in July, when a gang of Texas Democrat “fleebaggers” fled their state in a stunt to deny a quorum and prevent a vote on some kind of pro-life or election reform bill or some other sensible thing they opposed. Even though 100% of the fleebaggers were “double-vaxxed”, many of them came down with the virus on this trip and ultimately spread it to some of their colleagues in the White House. Now, anyone who knows anything about vaccines knows that no vaccine is 100% effective, but this level of community spread in a situation where everyone was vaccinated was shocking to me, and should have been shocking to anybody. The most parsimonious explanation for what happened is that one of the fleebaggers had the virus and then spread it to all the rest – followed by a tertiary transmission by at least one of them to somebody at the White House later on.

Why did this worry me so much? Consider this 2017 hypothesis paper by Kennedy and Read that I’ve been teaching in both my microbiology and evolution classes for several years. The authors talk about why antibiotic resistance evolves more readily in most cases than vaccine resistance – namely that antibiotics are applied when you’re already sick and therefore full of bacteria whereas vaccines are applied before virus exposure and therefore are rarely challenged by more than a small number of virus genomes. The rate of evolutionary improvement in these cases is limited by mutational supply – you need a lot of random mutations challenging the antimicrobial to discover the rare one that confers resistance – and mutational supply is a function of population size. Kennedy and Read then bolster their conceptual argument by considering the handful of vaccines that have failed due to pathogen evolution. Every one of these failed vaccines had at least one of two characteristics: either they targeted a single protein, or else they were incapable of fully preventing infection and transmission. In the former case, it is much easier to find a single mutation that can provide complete vaccine evasion, since vaccinated individuals have a very simple response compared to the layered polyvalent response created by natural infection. In the latter case, even though the vaccine is initially capable of suppressing viral symptoms, it allows large viral populations to accumulate, exponentially increasing the number of mutants that can challenge the vaccine-induced immune response. Every vaccine with one of these characteristics failed; every SARS-2 vaccine has both characteristics: the SARS-2 vaccines solely target the SARS-2 spike protein, and the fleebagger incident strongly suggested they were incapable of suppressing viral reproduction and transmission.

At that moment, I knew that viral evolution would eventually defeat the vaccines, and started looking for evidence of the fact. It wasn’t long before those countries and states that publish weekly detailed datasets started revealing exactly the trend I expected – an ever-shrinking gap between infection rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. Eventually in the UK, vaccinated populations were being infected more than unvaccinated populations. One can wave their hands to explain that away – there are obviously differences between who chooses to vax and who doesn’t that could be relevant to virus exposure – but you can’t explain away the fact that the vaccine provides only a marginal and ever-shrinking level of protection, and has no effect on transmission rates. In other words, the SARS-2 vaccines are not even remotely capable of stopping or even slowing the progression of the SARS-2 outbreak, and vaccine mandates are futile and doomed to fail.

(I thought about putting up some of my own data analysis here but there’s not much point… others have done it much more thoroughly than I have time to. I strongly encourage you to read the blogger eugyppius’ substack – he is an anonymous biologist living in Bavaria who provides consistently solid analysis of the various datastreams available. But if you don’t trust anonymous bloggers, consider reading this recently-published letter from the notorious QAnon publication The Lancet that lays out the case for vaccine failure in a wonderfully concise two pages and one figure.)

So this has been accumulating for months now, and it honestly escapes me how anyone – and especially doctors and scientists – could not be aware of it by now. It’s so in-your-face it’s ridiculous. Moreover, the question of whether vaccine-derived immunity or natural immunity is superior would appear to be conclusively settled – there have been millions of “break-through” infections of the vaccinated, whereas detected re-infections remain so rare the CDC is forced to publish weirdly gerrymandered datasets with a couple hundred cases to try to make its case about why you should keep getting jabbed even if you’ve had SARS-2 and recovered. But the authorities in these matters still stubbornly refuse to accept what is right before their eyes, and cling to the vaccines as the only way out of the “pandemic”. Consider this tidbit from a recent email my university sent out, reminding us about how they have to fire every employee who hasn’t submitted their vaxx cards by January 4 or else President Brandon will take their grants away (emphasis mine):

Please continue to look to official UAB communications for the latest news and updates. If you have not already, please get vaccinated to keep yourself and everyone around you safe. Vaccines are free, safe, effective, and critical to putting an end to the pandemic as soon as possible.

NONE OF THIS IS TRUE. The vaccines aren’t free – they cost taxpayers $20 a pop give or take. They aren’t particularly safe – as of this writing 8,898 deaths along with an order of magnitude more heart attacks, miscarriages, anaphylaxis, and other horrors related to the SARS-2 vaccines have been reported to the CDC’s VAERS database, and nobody has given me any reason to believe that these numbers are anything but a low-ball estimate of the risks associated with vaxxing. They aren’t effective, as I’ve shown above. Maybe they provide some level of risk reduction? But even that appears to be slipping if you look at the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed death rates month-by-month, consistent with the hypothesis that adaptive evolution is causing the SARS-2 population to become progressively more immune to the existing crop of vaccines. And the last statement – that vaccination is an important part of ending the pandemic – is laughably false and grossly irresponsible. If anything, mass vaccination of the population has prolonged the pandemic by slowing down the development of robust natural immunity.

Not only is none of this true, but all of it is coming out of a university whose administration is almost entirely staffed by doctors and scientists! Here’s their justification for threatening to fire unvaxxed employees, including the many who have naturally recovered from infection and are therefore almost certainly more SARS-2-resistant than the vaccinated employees, from the same email quoted above (emphasis mine):

Because this vaccination requirement is mandated by the federal government, UAB does not have flexibility in its application or enforcement. Failure to comply will place UAB in jeopardy of losing millions of dollars that we receive through federal contracts and awards, as well as jobs funded, in part, by those dollars.

On some level I understand that they are reluctant to jeopardize their grant money by angering the doddering and capricious Brandon regime, and one has to appreciate the UAB administration’s honesty in openly admitting they prioritize grant dollars over the lives and wellbeing of their employees, but at this point they know as well as I do that vaccine mandates have no public health dimension at all. If we vaxxed 100% of the population, nothing important would happen other than a few thousand more people — many of them children — would die from vaccine-related injuries. That doctors would go along with the regime’s dangerous, counter-productive, anti-scientific, and politically-driven mandate without even providing a token resistance is, in my opinion, grotesque malpractice, and any so-called doctor colluding to facilitate or provide cover for this great crime should be stripped of their right to practice medicine for the rest of their lives.

The public looks to their doctors for guidance; they look to scientists for knowledge; and we are giving them shitty advice and lying to them in order to appease a political regime that openly and unapologetically hates half of the population it governs. It’s unconscionable; in its deception it is disturbingly similar to the crime that was committed by the researchers behind the Tuskegee Experiment, only spread to every walk of life and every corner of the nation. If doctors and scientists don’t start publicly pushing back against this shit and calling out the quacks who are willing to deceive the public for grant payouts, they are going to come after us with pitchforks and torches like in the Frankenstein movies. And rightfully so! Consider this blog my declaration of which side of that mob I would rather be on.

Am I He?

Posted by Jeff Morris on November 11, 2021
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

Where is the fighting man?

Am I he?

You would trade every truth

For hollow victories

Maybe I find some solace in the thought that many millions before me have faced similar struggles, as their people fade into obscurity and their empires crumble, like clockwork. Regardless, the one-two punch of the first two tracks on this album (“Empire Falls” and “Gallows Hymn”) are among the most powerful experiences in metal. Enjoy them, and perhaps ask yourself, are you the fighting man? Or are you doing little but growing old?

Why American Corporations Don’t Care If You Boycott Them

Posted by Jeff Morris on April 6, 2021
Posted in: Economics, Politics. Leave a comment

Well it finally happened – Major League Baseball bent the knee. We all knew it would eventually happen, although one must admit to holding on to some hope after they held out throughout the Trump years, when every other professional sports organization in the United States performatively humbled themselves before the new religion. It took a pandemic to ruin baseball – they were proud and independent in 2019, but when they reopened in 2020 they were a shell of their former selves. Players started kneeling to the BLM icons, the Cleveland Indians decided to change their name, and now, the coup de gras, the entire league decides to “boycott” the state of Georgia in protest over an election law.

So many directions I could go with this. The election law itself is harmless. The reporting about it is utterly false. Leftist opposition to the law is almost certainly driven by opposition to any attempt to limit their rigging of elections. I could talk about how I love baseball, how it was one of the last pure expressions of American culture untainted by the new faith, and how utterly demoralizing and depressing it is to see it corrupted (I guess that’s the point, right).

Others will cover all of those things, but I’m going to lay out a different argument based on something I’ve been mulling over for a while. Ever since major corporations started aggressively shilling for leftist causes – around the beginning of the Trump era, not coincidentally – I have wondered “How is it in the interests of the shareholders for a company to take positions that alienate roughly 50% of the customer base?” I have long felt the same way about celebrities – how are you helping your career by becoming so political that half of the country can’t watch your movies or listen to your music?

One would think that the wise thing to do would be to avoid politics and politically charged positions like the plague if you were dependent on the opinions of consumers for your bottom line. But this clearly isn’t the attitude that the US Elites take; they do not appear to be worried at all that pissing off tens of millions of conservatives will hurt their business. Indeed, there have been huge boycotts of corporations by conservatives over the past few years – I haven’t used a Gillette product since their cringey “Toxic Masculinity” ad campaign from 2019, and Colin Kaepernick’s antics have decimated the NFL’s viewership and cost the league billions of dollars – but none of these efforts ever seem to affect the corporations’ political stances. What’s going on here?

One possibility is that the corporate elite actually cares about these causes. Maybe the NFL really does worry about the (non-existent) plague of police shootings of unarmed black people. Maybe the (non-existent) plight of the tens of thousands of newly-minted late-onset gender dysphoriac girls keeps the board of Coca-Cola up at night. The cognitive gymnastics necessary to believe this are definitely outside of my mental range of motion – aren’t these the same “one percenters” that leftists blame for all of these problems to begin with? Aren’t they inheritors of the system that colonized and looted India and Africa? Am I really expected to believe that Gordon Gekko had a Road to Damascus moment and converted to Wokianity? I mean, Current Year is bizarre, but that’s asking a lot of my poor brain.

The alternative explanation is that there’s something in it for these companies for pushing these agendas. That however much money they “lose” due to right-wing boycotts, they gain more through some other mechanism. What if the goods and services we see a company selling are not an important source of the company’s income? Basically, the possibility presented itself to me that large corporations had an exoteric and an esoteric business model. The exoteric business model is what we can see – we assume that Major League Baseball makes money by selling us baseball, we assume that Coca-Cola makes money by selling sodas, we assume that Delta sells us plane tickets, etc. But what if there is an underlying, esoteric component to the business? For instance, what if Delta makes more money by trading securities than running its airline, or by getting first dibs on massive government contracts, or through some kind of foreign kickbacks? Such that the exoteric business doesn’t matter all that much, and they could afford to take a loss on it basically forever as long as it propped up their real, esoteric business.

It’s easy to see how a large enough company could get to this point. Anybody with a 401K (or a 403B, fellow academic gulag residents) knows that money makes money, and the goal is to get to the point where wages (or profits) are only a minor portion of your portfolio. How much more the case for a corporation – once your firm has become “too big to fail”, perhaps keeping your mouth close to the spigot from which dollars flow from the federal reservoir is more important than the business that got you to that point in the first place. Perhaps keeping the regime happy becomes your real business, and the continued production of widgets or ball games or movies is just a rump operation, an annoying charade.

Which brings the question, why does MLB still bother to stage baseball games at all? Why does Coca-Cola bother selling sodas? Why not just convert themselves entirely into exoteric hedge funds and quit bothering with the whole “selling things” gimmick? Again, this is all just wild-ass spitballing, but I figure there are two likely reasons:

  1. The regime needs the exoteric businesses for propaganda purposes. One could ask, why does the regime care about these businesses at all? It’s possible that the regime needs to parasitize the accumulated respect these famous corporations have from previous decades of selling beloved products in order to justify whatever it is the regime is trying to sell us. When some rando politician tells us that men are now women and the United States has always been at war with Eastasia, you might tend to write them off as crazy. When the New York Yankees say the same thing, it carries more weight. When every company in the US simultaneously peddles the same propaganda, it creates a very difficult to ignore impact on anyone who lives here. To the degree that this is true, one might conclude that the product these businesses are now selling is clout; they are selling off good will in return for government investment in their hedge funds.
  2. The exoteric businesses work as a money laundering operation. Essentially, the esoteric business model I’ve described is an arguably criminal act of collusion between business elites and the government, representing a massive betrayal of the trust of the 99.999% of the population that doesn’t sit on a board of trustees of a megacorp or work in the executive or legislative branch of the US government. If MLB shuttered all the stadiums, fired all the players, and kept making money, it would reveal this to everyone. Just like drug cartels have to figure out ways to funnel their obscene profits through legitimate businesses, megacorps have to conceal their esoteric cash flows by maintaining the appearance of running normal businesses. Even with 50% reductions in viewership, people still come to NFL games, creating plausible deniability about what’s going on. And of course the concern is likely that if the consumer public ever caught on to what was really going on, the people making these profits would be torn limb from limb by angry mobs. To the degree that this is true, most large American corporations run their exoteric business operations the same way, and for the same purpose, that robber barons ran their philanthropic operations – as a smokescreen to conceal activities that the average Joe would find abominable.

Like I said, I freely admit that this is all a half-baked conspiracy theory. But it was such a galaxy brain moment when it occurred to me that I really needed to get it down on (virtual) paper to see where it went. The notion that the entire material economy of the United States was a money laundering operation for government-associated hedge funds sounds nuts, but if you spend a few minutes reading about what our ruling elite – and especially the hedge fund guys and gals – believe in terms of economics, it starts to seem more plausible. “Modern monetary theory”, which appears to have adherents amongst the Biden apparatchiks, maintains that money has no real basis other than the will of the government that prints it, so the notion that you can’t just manufacture as much of it as you want is simply false. By divorcing money from value, this mindset obviates the need for a real world economy at all – or at least it separates production from wealth, which are factors that may be independently manipulated by the government however it sees fit. That certainly sounds like Soviet propaganda to me, which makes me wonder which regime exactly is the one that profits from the Woke Capital trend. I mean, all of this, from the gutting of the real economy to the strip-mining of respect for our great companies and institutions to the fact that all of this is a pressure campaign to make it easier to rig elections certainly doesn’t appear to benefit the United States or the great majority of its people, but it could certainly help a Great Power rival hasten our replacement as the world’s economic leader.

The last point I want to make here is that the framing of megacorp pressure campaigns against Georgia election integrity reforms as a “boycott” is insultingly absurd. The word “boycott” comes from the name of a man who organized tenant farmers against high rents in the 19th century, and it has traditionally been applied to mass movements by people low in the socio-economic hierarchy to put pressure on the moneyed interests that exert power over them. Far from that, the Georgia case involves incredibly powerful corporations using their financial heft against everyday voters. If anything, these corporations are more powerful than the Georgia government they are trying to pressure. It’s literally the opposite of a boycott; it’s more like the US dropping sanctions on some hapless third world country it doesn’t like.

Ok, I am ending the rant now. It’s entirely possible I am way off on this interpretation of events – but Woke Capital is pretty sus, y’all, and I’ve got my eye on it.

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Recent Posts

    • “Make Biology Great Again, Mr President” March 7, 2025
    • How to Rig an Election If You’re a Scientist February 9, 2023
    • Found: Nazi Flag in the US Capitol December 21, 2022
    • For Giving Tuesday, Support a Cancelled Professor November 29, 2022
    • The 20th Anniversary of Palindrome November 20, 2022
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

The Antisocial Darwinist
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Join 58 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Antisocial Darwinist
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...